Follow Us on Twitter
Like Us on Facebook
Subscribe on Youtube
Help
Register Now!
RSS FeedView Other Content
Categories See All →
Search Articles
Recent Articles
Recent Comments
-
AL-GHAZALI AS AN ISLAMIC RE...
By Warda101, May 12 2013 12:02 PM -
The symbol of the freemason...
By Ibn-Masud, Jan 24 2013 03:39 AM -
Shia Extremists Vs. Sunni E...
By luverofhussain, Dec 09 2012 06:43 AM -
Married or not you should r...
By luverofhussain, Dec 09 2012 06:30 AM -
AL-GHAZALI AS AN ISLAMIC RE...
By Khalid_the_Wa..., Nov 20 2012 10:53 AM -
Married or not you should r...
By 4dvti, Aug 03 2012 06:57 PM
Enlightenment
Shia Extremists Vs. Sunni Extremists - One And ...
May 27 2011 11:06 PM | Tahir-Riaz in Enlightenment
The purpose of this thread is to highlight the extent of the ignorance exhibited by the masses. Refer to the video below,
Once again we exhibit a mullah making a speech on a topic that has no bearing on anybodys life or anything to do with the core set of beliefs of a Muslim. No difference there - its a trait shared by the Sunni mullah.
As a viewer, it would be very convenient to label this as a gathering of ignorant shias. The speech of the shia speaker would definitely seem very alien but the reaction of the audience is by no means unfamiliar. I hope this video will serve as a self-awakening call who respond to the chants of hate of their ignorant Pirs regardless of what sect they belong to.
The Shia scholar in this instance firstly attempts to make a distinction between a "Siddiq" as appointed by God vs. a "Siddiq" appointed by people. Then he alleges that the Siddiq appointed by Allah Taalah i.e. Hazrat Ibrahim (A) told three lies. On this basis, he concludes imagine how many lies were told by the "Siddiq" appointed by people referring to Hazrat Abu Bakr ®.
The audience goes nuts. They think its amazing logic. You can hear them praising the scholar and stating, "Wah, kya baat hai!". This is followed by some naaras.
Unfortunately, none amongst the audience were willing to use their brains. They heard what they wanted to hear. The far reaching implications of the scholars statement of to check the consistency of the accusation with their core beliefs was never on the cards.
1. The word "Siddiq" means truthful. According to the shia scholar, Hazrat Ibrahim (A) was made "Siddiq" by Allah Taalah yet he lied (Naazubillah). That in itself is a contradiction.
2. The title of "Siddiq" was given to "Hazrat Abu Bakr ®" by the Holy Prophet (S) when he testified to the event of the Night of Ascension. It is therefore not a title nominated by people as he alleges.
The above are two very basic points. Anybody with very limited knowledge and basic common sense can work this out yet they don't?
Therefore the next time you are responding to the hate-speech and illogical conclusions of a Pir or Scholar on stage, calling other kafir, escalating the celebration of milad to the level of a pillar of faith and levying false accusations to a popular personality, remember this video and think,
1. What he is saying - does it make sense?
2. What implications does such a belief entail?
3. Is it contradictory to our core belief set?
4. Are we any different?
Don't be a sheep! Don't be a fool! Think - use your brain. Acquire some basic knowledge if you don't have any. Don't let the Mullah control your minds.
Shia Mullah vs. Wahabi Mullah vs. Deobandi Mullah vs. Barelvi Mullah - they are one and the same and so are their followers!
Read story → 4 comments
Once again we exhibit a mullah making a speech on a topic that has no bearing on anybodys life or anything to do with the core set of beliefs of a Muslim. No difference there - its a trait shared by the Sunni mullah.
As a viewer, it would be very convenient to label this as a gathering of ignorant shias. The speech of the shia speaker would definitely seem very alien but the reaction of the audience is by no means unfamiliar. I hope this video will serve as a self-awakening call who respond to the chants of hate of their ignorant Pirs regardless of what sect they belong to.
The Shia scholar in this instance firstly attempts to make a distinction between a "Siddiq" as appointed by God vs. a "Siddiq" appointed by people. Then he alleges that the Siddiq appointed by Allah Taalah i.e. Hazrat Ibrahim (A) told three lies. On this basis, he concludes imagine how many lies were told by the "Siddiq" appointed by people referring to Hazrat Abu Bakr ®.
The audience goes nuts. They think its amazing logic. You can hear them praising the scholar and stating, "Wah, kya baat hai!". This is followed by some naaras.
Unfortunately, none amongst the audience were willing to use their brains. They heard what they wanted to hear. The far reaching implications of the scholars statement of to check the consistency of the accusation with their core beliefs was never on the cards.
1. The word "Siddiq" means truthful. According to the shia scholar, Hazrat Ibrahim (A) was made "Siddiq" by Allah Taalah yet he lied (Naazubillah). That in itself is a contradiction.
2. The title of "Siddiq" was given to "Hazrat Abu Bakr ®" by the Holy Prophet (S) when he testified to the event of the Night of Ascension. It is therefore not a title nominated by people as he alleges.
The above are two very basic points. Anybody with very limited knowledge and basic common sense can work this out yet they don't?
Therefore the next time you are responding to the hate-speech and illogical conclusions of a Pir or Scholar on stage, calling other kafir, escalating the celebration of milad to the level of a pillar of faith and levying false accusations to a popular personality, remember this video and think,
1. What he is saying - does it make sense?
2. What implications does such a belief entail?
3. Is it contradictory to our core belief set?
4. Are we any different?
Don't be a sheep! Don't be a fool! Think - use your brain. Acquire some basic knowledge if you don't have any. Don't let the Mullah control your minds.
Shia Mullah vs. Wahabi Mullah vs. Deobandi Mullah vs. Barelvi Mullah - they are one and the same and so are their followers!
Read story → 4 comments